<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:10:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Matrimonial finance law: Law Commission to review to what extent one party should meet the other’s needs and what should be the treatment of “non-matrimonial property”</title>
		<link>http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2012/02/matrimonial-finance-law-law-commission-to-review-to-what-extent-one-party-should-meet-the-other%e2%80%99s-needs-and-what-should-be-the-treatment-of-%e2%80%9cnon-matrimonial-property%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2012/02/matrimonial-finance-law-law-commission-to-review-to-what-extent-one-party-should-meet-the-other%e2%80%99s-needs-and-what-should-be-the-treatment-of-%e2%80%9cnon-matrimonial-property%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lorian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/?p=386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Law Commission is to review two aspects of matrimonial finance law that entitles married couples and civil partners to claim financial provision from one another on divorce or ...<br /><a href="http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2012/02/matrimonial-finance-law-law-commission-to-review-to-what-extent-one-party-should-meet-the-other%e2%80%99s-needs-and-what-should-be-the-treatment-of-%e2%80%9cnon-matrimonial-property%e2%80%9d/">Read More</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2012/02/matrimonial-finance-law-law-commission-to-review-to-what-extent-one-party-should-meet-the-other%e2%80%99s-needs-and-what-should-be-the-treatment-of-%e2%80%9cnon-matrimonial-property%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>£2.3 million High Court settlement for Brain Injured Client</title>
		<link>http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2012/01/2-3-million-high-court-settlement-for-brain-injured-client/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2012/01/2-3-million-high-court-settlement-for-brain-injured-client/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 11:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lorian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/?p=382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>24.11.11</p> <p>The litigation department were recently successful in securing the future needs of a claimant, who sadly suffered significant injuries in a road traffic collision.</p> <p>The Claimant was a ...<br /><a href="http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2012/01/2-3-million-high-court-settlement-for-brain-injured-client/">Read More</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2012/01/2-3-million-high-court-settlement-for-brain-injured-client/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cohabitation &#8211; Supreme Court rules on unmarried couples&#8217; property rights</title>
		<link>http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2011/11/cohabitation-supreme-court-rules-on-unmarried-couples-property-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2011/11/cohabitation-supreme-court-rules-on-unmarried-couples-property-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 11:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lorian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/?p=376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This related to an Appeal heard by the Supreme Court (the highest court in England and Wales). The Supreme Court reviewed the correct approach to calculating beneficial interests in ...<br /><a href="http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2011/11/cohabitation-supreme-court-rules-on-unmarried-couples-property-rights/">Read More</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2011/11/cohabitation-supreme-court-rules-on-unmarried-couples-property-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High Court upholds French pre-nuptial agreement Z v- Z (No 2)</title>
		<link>http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2011/11/high-court-upholds-french-pre-nuptial-agreement-z-v-z-no-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2011/11/high-court-upholds-french-pre-nuptial-agreement-z-v-z-no-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lorian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/?p=374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The main issue in this case was whether a French marriage contract (a pre-nuptial agreement) should be upheld.</p> <p>Facts</p> <p>Both parties were French. The wife was 50 and the ...<br /><a href="http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2011/11/high-court-upholds-french-pre-nuptial-agreement-z-v-z-no-2/">Read More</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2011/11/high-court-upholds-french-pre-nuptial-agreement-z-v-z-no-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The treatment of Lottery wins in divorce proceedings</title>
		<link>http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2011/10/the-treatment-of-lottery-wins-in-divorce-proceedings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2011/10/the-treatment-of-lottery-wins-in-divorce-proceedings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lorian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/?p=370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The question of how a lottery win is dealt with by the courts in the context of divorce has recently been considered by the High Court in the case ...<br /><a href="http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2011/10/the-treatment-of-lottery-wins-in-divorce-proceedings/">Read More</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2011/10/the-treatment-of-lottery-wins-in-divorce-proceedings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cohabitation – No decision from the Government to reform Cohabitation law</title>
		<link>http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2011/09/cohabitationno-decision-from-the-government-to-reform-cohabitation-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2011/09/cohabitationno-decision-from-the-government-to-reform-cohabitation-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 14:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lorian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/?p=368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Law Commission has responded to the written ministerial statement issued by the Ministry of Justice stating that it does not intend to take forward the Law Commission&#8217;s recommendations ...<br /><a href="http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2011/09/cohabitationno-decision-from-the-government-to-reform-cohabitation-law/">Read More</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2011/09/cohabitationno-decision-from-the-government-to-reform-cohabitation-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disclosure and obtaining documents Imerman -v- Imerman</title>
		<link>http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2011/07/disclosure-and-obtaining-documents-imerman-v-imerman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2011/07/disclosure-and-obtaining-documents-imerman-v-imerman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lorian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/?p=364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Until recently where a married couple was separating, if one spouse obtained information or documents belonging to the other, rules established in the case of Hildebrand (1992) provided that ...<br /><a href="http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2011/07/disclosure-and-obtaining-documents-imerman-v-imerman/">Read More</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2011/07/disclosure-and-obtaining-documents-imerman-v-imerman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How trust assets should be treated in ancillary relief proceedings &#8211; Whaley v Whaley [2011] – 31st May 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2011/06/how-trust-assets-should-be-treated-in-ancillary-relief-proceedings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2011/06/how-trust-assets-should-be-treated-in-ancillary-relief-proceedings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lorian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/?p=361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This was a Husband’s appeal in ancillary relief proceedings focusing on the treatment of trust assets. The Court of Appeal determined that as the Husband clearly had access to ...<br /><a href="http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2011/06/how-trust-assets-should-be-treated-in-ancillary-relief-proceedings/">Read More</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2011/06/how-trust-assets-should-be-treated-in-ancillary-relief-proceedings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Family Procedure Rules – 6th April 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2011/05/new-family-procedure-rules-6th-april-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2011/05/new-family-procedure-rules-6th-april-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 15:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lorian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fieldoverell.co.uk/articles/?p=358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The new Family Procedure Rules 2010 (“FPR”) came into effect on 6th April 2011. They consolidate the existing different set of rules and provide a single set of rules ...<br /><a href="http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2011/05/new-family-procedure-rules-6th-april-2011/">Read More</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2011/05/new-family-procedure-rules-6th-april-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kernott -v- Jones. Update on cohabitation case law – 5/10/10</title>
		<link>http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2011/03/update-on-cohabitation-case-law-51010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2011/03/update-on-cohabitation-case-law-51010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lorian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.fieldoverell.co.uk/articles/?p=351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Former co-habitees Leonard Kernott and Patricia Jones took their legal battle to The Court of Appeal and the Court of Appeal handed down its decision on 26th May 2010. ...<br /><a href="http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2011/03/update-on-cohabitation-case-law-51010/">Read More</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fieldoverell.com/articles/index.php/2011/03/update-on-cohabitation-case-law-51010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

