Matrimonial finance law: Law Commission to review to what extent one party should meet the other’s needs and what should be the treatment of “non-matrimonial property”

The Law Commission is to review two aspects of matrimonial finance law that entitles married couples and civil partners to claim financial provision from one another on divorce or dissolution of their civil partnership.

The Law Commission will examine the extent to which one party should be required to meet the other’s needs after the relationship has ended. It will also consider how what is known as “non-matrimonial property” should be treated on divorce or dissolution. Non matrimonial property refers to assets acquired by either party before the marriage or civil partnership, or received by gift or inheritance.

The Commission will not, however, be conducting a full-scale review of the matrimonial finance law.  The aim of the review is to provide clarification and more certainty on those two areas law which have been the subject of extensive case law.

The Law commission will publish a consultation paper dealing with these issues later this year and a final report during 2013.

 

If you would like further advice in connection with the matters raised in this article then please contact Miss Vincent in our family department on 01926 422 101.

£2.3 million High Court settlement for Brain Injured Client

24.11.11

The litigation department were recently successful in securing the future needs of a claimant, who sadly suffered significant injuries in a road traffic collision.

The Claimant was a …
Read More

Cohabitation – Supreme Court rules on unmarried couples’ property rights

This related to an Appeal heard by the Supreme Court (the highest court in England and Wales). The Supreme Court reviewed the correct approach to calculating beneficial interests in …
Read More

High Court upholds French pre-nuptial agreement Z v- Z (No 2)

The main issue in this case was whether a French marriage contract (a pre-nuptial agreement) should be upheld.

Facts

Both parties were French. The wife was 50 and the …
Read More

The treatment of Lottery wins in divorce proceedings

The question of how a lottery win is dealt with by the courts in the context of divorce has recently been considered by the High Court in the case …
Read More

Cohabitation – No decision from the Government to reform Cohabitation law

The Law Commission has responded to the written ministerial statement issued by the Ministry of Justice stating that it does not intend to take forward the Law Commission’s recommendations …
Read More

Disclosure and obtaining documents Imerman -v- Imerman

Until recently where a married couple was separating, if one spouse obtained information or documents belonging to the other, rules established in the case of Hildebrand (1992) provided that …
Read More

How trust assets should be treated in ancillary relief proceedings – Whaley v Whaley [2011] – 31st May 2011

This was a Husband’s appeal in ancillary relief proceedings focusing on the treatment of trust assets. The Court of Appeal determined that as the Husband clearly had access to …
Read More

New Family Procedure Rules – 6th April 2011

The new Family Procedure Rules 2010 (“FPR”) came into effect on 6th April 2011. They consolidate the existing different set of rules and provide a single set of rules …
Read More

Kernott -v- Jones. Update on cohabitation case law – 5/10/10

Former co-habitees Leonard Kernott and Patricia Jones took their legal battle to The Court of Appeal and the Court of Appeal handed down its decision on 26th May 2010. …
Read More

Janine Thomson becomes Member of Resolution

The firm is pleased to announce that Janine Thomson, Assistant to Séverine Vincent (Associate Solicitor) in our Family Department, has successfully completed the Family Law Assistant Certificate offered by …
Read More

Law Commission consultation paper on the future of pre-nuptial agreements, 17th January 2011

The Law Commission has published its long-awaited consultation paper “Marital Property Agreements” on the future of pre-nuptial agreements. Responses are sought by the 11 April 2011. The Law Commission …
Read More

Unauthorised Tenants Awarded Extra Protection

Background:

When letting out a residential property on which there is a mortgage, a landlord should first obtain the consent of their mortgage lender. Tenants of landlords who have …
Read More

HIPS and EPCs

HIPs – The Current Position

In an attempt to reduce the cost of moving house, on 21st May 2010 the duty to supply a Home Information Pack when selling …
Read More

Severine wins a defended divorce, February 11, 2011

Severine recently acted on a defended divorce which went all the way to a 2 day final contested hearing. Severine was instructed by the Petitioner husband in this matter, …
Read More

Janine Thomson: third person in the country to be awarded with the Family Law Assistant Certificate by Resolution

Janine Thomson, assistant to Séverine Vincent (Associate Solicitor) is the third person in the country to be awarded with the Family Law Assistant Certificate by Resolution.

Whilst working full …
Read More

Department news update: 9th June 2010 Re C (Children)

Severine recently acted on an injunction case where she represented the Defendant father. The matter was heard in the Birmingham High Court by one of the most senior family …
Read More

Pre-nuptial v. postnuptial agreements, McLeod v. McLeod 2008

MacLeod v MacLeod [2008] UKPC 64

This was a Privy Councili decision handed down on 18 December 2008 which addressed the question of enforceability of pre-nuptial and post-nuptial agreements. …
Read More

Prenup: where are we now after the Court of Appeal’s decision in Radmacher v. Granatino 2009?

Radmacher v Granatino [2009] EWCA Civ 649

This was an Appeal by a wife (one of Germany’s richest woman said to be worth £100 million) against an award in …
Read More

Rachmacher v. Gratino 2010 UKSC42: The Supreme Court upholds the Court of Appeal decision, 20th October 2010

Rachmacher –v- Gratino [2010]UKSC42 – The Supreme Court upholds the Court of Appeal decision – 20th October 2010

The Supreme Court found in favour of the wife and held …
Read More

Developments in road traffic accident claims

The Ministry of Justice Reforms have resulted in a new process for dealing with road traffic accident claims valued at between £1,000.00 and £10,000.00.

The claims are now submitted …
Read More

Claim against husband in road traffic accident

The firm has been successful in obtaining damages for our client K who was involved in a road traffic accident and received a settlement of £5,900.00 from her husband’s …
Read More

Our specialist personal injury team recover £60,000

Our specialist personal injury team was successful in recovering the sum of £60,000 for our client C who was a rear seat passenger in a vehicle was driven negligently …
Read More

Ex wife walks out with 2 million share of ex-husband’s lottery win

It is reported that CIRENCESTER lottery millionaire Nigel Page has agreed to give a share of his £56 euromillons lottery winnings to his ex-wife. Mr Page’s ex-wife, Wendy, 43, …
Read More

Our specialist personal injury team recover damages of £33,450

Our specialist personal injury team have recovered damages for our client G.A. in the sum of £33,450.00 in respect of an accident at work during the course of his …
Read More

 
Home  |   About us  |   Our people  |   Recruitment  |   Articles  |   News  |   FAQ's  |   Contact

Field Overell LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership registered in England & Wales. Registered Office: 42 Warwick Street, Leamington Spa, Warwickshire CV32 5JS Registered Number OC364714.
A reference to a partner of Field Overell LLP means a member of Field Overell LLP or an employee with partner status. A list of members is available for inspection at the offices of the Firm.
Field Overell LLP is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority
Copyright - 2011 Field Overell LLP